Moneycontrol PRO
Check Credit Score
Check Credit Score
HomeNewsBusiness

Did Shaktikanta Das just distance himself from RBI panel’s recommendation on corporate houses' entry into banking?

The Reserve Bank of India Governor Shaktikanta Dad said the internal working group's propsal that large corporate houses should be allowed to promote banka is not the RBI's official view

December 04, 2020 / 09:46 PM IST
 
 
live
  • bselive
  • nselive
Volume
Todays L/H
More

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has not taken an official decision on an internal working group (IWG) report that recommended entry of corporate houses into banking, RBI governor Shaktikanta Das said during the post-monetary policy presser on December 4.

On November 20, the IWG suggested that business houses and large NBFCs (non-banking financial companies) can be given tickets to set up banks, triggering a major debate among experts on the impact of letting companies set up banks in the financial system.

Das said the IWG proposal is not the RBI’s official view.

“It is a report of the IWG, not the RBI’s official view. The IWG has two external members. It has acted independently. They have given an extra point of view. The RBI has not taken any decision. Our approach is consultative (on this issue). The report is in public domain. After comments, we will examine and take a considered decision,” Das said.

Experts, including RBI's former governor governor Raghuram Rajan and former deputy governor Viral Acharya, came out openly in the public with strong criticism against the idea., while others, including former ICICI Bank CEO K V Kamath and Bandhan Bank CEO Chandra Shekhar Ghosh, supported the idea saying with enough regulations, corporate entry will be good for the sector.

Das’ comments are significant. If one reads between the lines, Das has distanced itself from the controversial suggestions amid the public backlash. In an article for Mint , Kamath said India should consider opening up the banking sector, letting corporates join the sector under tight supervision.

“Since India must broaden and deepen its financial system to achieve its national goals, we need to seriously consider letting corporate players in, albeit once appropriate checks and balances are in place to ensure systemic stability,” Kamath wrote.

Explaining his logic, Kamath said risks for allowing corporate houses in banking sector were true of any sector. “The question is how we mitigate this risk with checks and balances,” Kamath said.

Both Rajan and Acharya are strongly opposed to the idea of letting private businesses in the business of banking. In an article written jointly and shared on a social media platform, Rajan and Acharya described the IWG's most important recommendation—letting businesses own banks—as a "bombshell".

While the proposals were tempered with many caveats, they raised an important question, they said. “Why now? Have we learnt something that allows us to override all the prior cautions on allowing industrial houses into banking?” the authors said.

The RBI has been hesitant in letting large businesses promote banks. Rajan and Acharya questioned the urgency and timing of the proposal. “After all, committees are rarely set up out of the blue. Is there some dramatic change in perception that it is responding to,” they said.

In the appendix of the report, the IWG report said all experts it consulted barring one opposed the idea of corporate entry into banking. “Yet, it recommends the change,” Rajan and Acharya said.

The RBI has thrice issued licences to private banks since the nationalisation of banks. In the first round in 1993-94, the RBI gave licences to 10 private sector banks—Global Trust Bank Ltd, ICICI Bank Ltd, HDFC Bank Ltd, UTI Bank Ltd (renamed Axis Bank Ltd), Bank of Punjab, IndusInd Bank Ltd, Centurion Bank Ltd, IDBI Bank Ltd, Times Bank and Development Credit Bank Ltd. Some of these banks do not exist now as they were acquired by stronger banks.

In 2003-04, Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd and Yes Bank Ltd were allowed in. In 2014, IDFC First Bank and Bandhan Bank were given the licence.

The IWG proposals have come with certain riders. Large corporate and industrial houses may be allowed as promoters of banks only after necessary amendments to the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

This is aimed at preventing connected lending and exposures between the banks and other financial and non-financial group entities and strengthening of the supervisory mechanism for large conglomerates, including consolidated supervision.

However, Rajan and Acharya aren’t confident that these changes will be enough. “If sound regulation and supervision were only a matter of legislation, India would not have an NPA problem,” Rajan and Acharya said in the article.

Dinesh Unnikrishnan
Dinesh Unnikrishnan

Discover the latest business news, Sensex, and Nifty updates. Obtain Personal Finance insights, tax queries, and expert opinions on Moneycontrol or download the Moneycontrol App to stay updated!

Advisory Alert: It has come to our attention that certain individuals are representing themselves as affiliates of Moneycontrol and soliciting funds on the false promise of assured returns on their investments. We wish to reiterate that Moneycontrol does not solicit funds from investors and neither does it promise any assured returns. In case you are approached by anyone making such claims, please write to us at grievanceofficer@nw18.com or call on 02268882347